```
λ mc admin decommission start alias/ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4}
```
```
λ mc admin decommission status alias/
┌─────┬─────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┬────────┐
│ ID │ Pools │ Capacity │ Status │
│ 1st │ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4} │ 439 GiB (used) / 561 GiB (total) │ Active │
│ 2nd │ http://minio{3...4}/data{1...4} │ 329 GiB (used) / 421 GiB (total) │ Active │
└─────┴─────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┴────────┘
```
```
λ mc admin decommission status alias/ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4}
Progress: ===================> [1GiB/sec] [15%] [4TiB/50TiB]
Time Remaining: 4 hours (started 3 hours ago)
```
```
λ mc admin decommission status alias/ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4}
ERROR: This pool is not scheduled for decommissioning currently.
```
```
λ mc admin decommission cancel alias/
┌─────┬─────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┬──────────┐
│ ID │ Pools │ Capacity │ Status │
│ 1st │ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4} │ 439 GiB (used) / 561 GiB (total) │ Draining │
└─────┴─────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┴──────────┘
```
> NOTE: Canceled decommission will not make the pool active again, since we might have
> Potentially partial duplicate content on the other pools, to avoid this scenario be
> very sure to start decommissioning as a planned activity.
```
λ mc admin decommission cancel alias/ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4}
┌─────┬─────────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────┐
│ ID │ Pools │ Capacity │ Status │
│ 1st │ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4} │ 439 GiB (used) / 561 GiB (total) │ Draining(Canceled) │
└─────┴─────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────┘
```
In cases where a cluster is degraded, we do not uphold our consistency
guarantee and we will write fewer erasure codes and rely on healing
to recreate the missing shards.
In some cases replacing known bad disks in practice take days.
We want to change the behavior of a known degraded system to keep
the erasure code promise of the storage class for each object.
This will create the objects with the same confidence as a fully
functional cluster. The tradeoff will be that objects created
during a partial outage will take up slightly more space.
This means that when the storage class is EC:4, there should
always be written 4 parity shards, even if some disks are unavailable.
When an object is created on a set, the disks are immediately
checked. If any disks are unavailable additional parity shards
will be made for each offline disk, up to 50% of the number of disks.
We add an internal metadata field with the actual and intended
erasure code level, this can optionally be picked up later by
the scanner if we decide that data like this should be re-sharded.
In lieu of new changes coming for server command line, this
change is to deprecate strict requirement for distributed setups
to provide root credentials.
Bonus: remove MINIO_WORM warning from April 2020, it is time to
remove this warning.
Current implementation requires server pools to have
same erasure stripe sizes, to facilitate same SLA
and expectations.
This PR allows server pools to be variadic, i.e they
do not have to be same erasure stripe sizes - instead
they should have SLA for parity ratio.
If the parity ratio cannot be guaranteed by the new
server pool, the deployment is rejected i.e server
pool expansion is not allowed.
Too many deployments come up with an odd number
of hosts or drives, to facilitate even distribution
among those setups allow for odd and prime numbers
based packs.
Fixes scenario where zones are appropriately
handled, along with supporting overriding set
count. The new fix also ensures that we handle
the various setup types properly.
Update documentation to properly indicate the
behavior.
Fixes#8750
Co-authored-by: Nitish Tiwari <nitish@minio.io>
Order for server:disk originally provided wouldn't stripe
wide and may lead to availability issues.
Also added Short-form examples using {1...n} and a
warning about {1..2} vs {1...3}
Harshavardhana
Klaus Post
WangYuMu
Eco
Ritesh H Shukla
Brian Candler
ebozduman
kannappanr
Nitish Tiwari
Rob Girard
silenceshell
Dee Koder
Nitish Tiwari