Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Scott Lamb b17761e871 move list_recordings_by_* logic into raw.rs
I want to start having the db.rs version augment this with the uncommitted
recordings, and it's nice to have the separation of the raw db vs augmented
versions. Also, this fits with the general theme of shrinking db.rs a bit.

I had to put the raw video_sample_entry_id into the rows rather than
the video_sample_entry Arc. In hindsight, this is better anyway: the common
callers don't need to do the btree lookup and arc clone on every row. I think
I'd originally done it that way only because I was quite new to rust and
didn't understand that db could be used from within the row callback given
that both borrows are immutable.
2018-03-01 20:59:05 -08:00
Scott Lamb b2a8b3c216 update "moonfire-nvr check" for new schema 2018-03-01 17:07:42 -08:00
Scott Lamb b677964d1a properly account for bytes to add with next flush
This was considering them as 0, so it would under-delete until the next flush
them delete all at once. That effectively doubled the number of bytes not yet
deleted as they're first transferred to garbage, flushed again, then unlinked.
2018-03-01 13:50:59 -08:00
Scott Lamb 0f2e71ec4a more safety around adding/deleting dirs 2018-03-01 12:24:32 -08:00
Scott Lamb b790075ca2 fix flush_if_sec updates not hitting db 2018-02-23 14:49:10 -08:00
Scott Lamb 81e1ec97b3 more sanity checking for delete_oldest_recordings 2018-02-23 14:05:07 -08:00
Scott Lamb 8d9939603e fix repeated deletions within a flush
When list_oldest_recordings was called twice with no intervening flush, it
returned the same rows twice. This led to trying to delete it twice and all
following flushes failing with a "no such recording x/y" message. Now, return
each row only once, and track how many bytes have been returned.

I think dir.rs's logic is still wrong for how many bytes to delete when
multiple recordings are flushed at once (it ignores the bytes added by the
first when computing the bytes to delete for the second), but this is
progress.
2018-02-23 13:49:57 -08:00
Scott Lamb 843e1b49c8 take FnMut closures by reference
I mistakenly thought these had to be monomorphized. (The FnOnce still
does, until rust-lang/rfcs#1909 is implemented.) Turns out this way works
fine. It should result in less compile time / code size, though I didn't check
this.
2018-02-23 09:19:42 -08:00
Scott Lamb bf45ae6011 extend recording_playback with an open_id
As noted in schema.sql, this can be used for disambiguation. It also may be
useful in diagnosing data integrity problems.

Also, sneak in a couple minor improvements: better diagnostics in a couple
places, fix to 1->2 upgrade procedure.
2018-02-22 21:46:41 -08:00
Scott Lamb b037c9bdd7 knob to reduce db commits (SSD write cycles)
This improves the practicality of having many streams (including the doubling
of streams by having main + sub streams for each camera). With these tuned
properly, extra streams don't cause any extra write cycles in normal or error
cases. Consider the worst case in which each RTSP session immediately sends a
single frame and then fails. Moonfire retries every second, so this would
formerly cause one commit per second per stream. (flush_if_sec=0 preserves
this behavior.) Now the commits can be arbitrarily infrequent by setting
higher values of flush_if_sec.

WARNING: this isn't production-ready! I hacked up dir.rs to make tests pass
and "moonfire-nvr run" work in the best-case scenario, but it doesn't handle
errors gracefully. I've been debating what to do when writing a recording
fails. I considered "abandoning" the recording then either reusing or skipping
its id. (in the latter case, marking the file as garbage if it can't be
unlinked immediately). I think now there's no point in abandoning a recording.
If I can't write to that file, there's no reason to believe another will work
better. It's better to retry that recording forever, and perhaps put the whole
directory into an error state that stops recording until those writes go
through. I'm planning to redesign dir.rs to make this happen.
2018-02-22 16:35:34 -08:00
Scott Lamb 31adbc1e9f initial split of database to a separate crate
It should reduce compile time / memory usage to put quite a bit of the code
into a separate crate. I also intend to limit visibility of some things to
only within the db crate, but that's for a future change. This is the smallest
move that will compile.
2018-02-20 23:15:39 -08:00