I think this is an ffmpeg bug, which I plan to report. In the meantime, this
makes the tests pass. Long-term, even if ffmpeg fixes this, I probably don't
want to continue doing acceptance tests against whatever version of ffmpeg
happens to be installed - my real targets of interest are the latest versions
of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, QuickTime, and VLC.
This significantly improves safety of the ffmpeg interface. The complex
ABIs aren't accessed directly from Rust. Instead, I have a small C
wrapper which uses the ffmpeg C API and the C headers at compile-time to
determine the proper ABI in the same way any C program using ffmpeg
would, so that the ABI doesn't have to be duplicated in Rust code.
I've tested with ffmpeg 2.x and ffmpeg 3.x; it seems to work properly
with both where before ffmpeg 3.x caused segfaults.
It still depends on ABI compatibility between the compiled and running
versions. C programs need this, too, and normal shared library
versioning practices provide this guarantee. But log both versions on
startup for diagnosing problems with this.
Fixes#7
This test is copied from the C++ implementation. It ensures the timestamps are
calculated accurately from the pts rather than using ffmpeg's estimated
duration. The Rust implementation was doing the easy-but-inaccurate thing, so
fix that to make the test pass.
Additionally, I did this with a code structure that should ensure the Rust
code never drops a Writer without indicating to the syncer that its uuid is
abandoned. Such a bug essentially leaks the partially-written file, although a
restart would cause it to be properly unlinked and marked as such. There are
no tests (yet) that exercise this scenario, though.
I should have submitted/pushed more incrementally but just played with it on
my computer as I was learning the language. The new Rust version more or less
matches the functionality of the current C++ version, although there are many
caveats listed below.
Upgrade notes: when moving from the C++ version, I recommend dropping and
recreating the "recording_cover" index in SQLite3 to pick up the addition of
the "video_sync_samples" column:
$ sudo systemctl stop moonfire-nvr
$ sudo -u moonfire-nvr sqlite3 /var/lib/moonfire-nvr/db/db
sqlite> drop index recording_cover;
sqlite3> create index ...rest of command as in schema.sql...;
sqlite3> ^D
Some known visible differences from the C++ version:
* .mp4 generation queries SQLite3 differently. Before it would just get all
video indexes in a single query. Now it leads with a query that should be
satisfiable by the covering index (assuming the index has been recreated as
noted above), then queries individual recording's indexes as needed to fill
a LRU cache. I believe this is roughly similar speed for the initial hit
(which generates the moov part of the file) and significantly faster when
seeking. I would have done it a while ago with the C++ version but didn't
want to track down a lru cache library. It was easier to find with Rust.
* On startup, the Rust version cleans up old reserved files. This is as in the
design; the C++ version was just missing this code.
* The .html recording list output is a little different. It's in ascending
order, with the most current segment shorten than an hour rather than the
oldest. This is less ergonomic, but it was easy. I could fix it or just wait
to obsolete it with some fancier JavaScript UI.
* commandline argument parsing and logging have changed formats due to
different underlying libraries.
* The JSON output isn't quite right (matching the spec / C++ implementation)
yet.
Additional caveats:
* I haven't done any proof-reading of prep.sh + install instructions.
* There's a lot of code quality work to do: adding (back) comments and test
coverage, developing a good Rust style.
* The ffmpeg foreign function interface is particularly sketchy. I'd
eventually like to switch to something based on autogenerated bindings.
I'd also like to use pure Rust code where practical, but once I do on-NVR
motion detection I'll need to existing C/C++ libraries for speed (H.264
decoding + OpenCL-based analysis).