2016-12-26 23:55:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
# Moonfire NVR Time Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-24 23:51:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Status: **current**
|
2016-12-26 23:55:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never
|
|
|
|
|
> sure.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> — Segal's law
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Objective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximize the likelihood Moonfire NVR's timestamps are useful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The timestamp corresponding to a video frame should roughly match timestamps
|
|
|
|
|
from other sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* another video stream from the same camera. Given a video frame from the
|
|
|
|
|
"main" stream, a video frame from the "sub" stream with a similar
|
|
|
|
|
timestamp should have been recorded near the same time, and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
This minimizes confusion when switching between views of these streams,
|
|
|
|
|
and when viewing the "main" stream timestamps corresponding to a motion
|
|
|
|
|
event gathered from the less CPU-intensive "sub" stream.
|
|
|
|
|
* on-camera motion events from the same camera. If the video frame reflects
|
|
|
|
|
the motion event, its timestamp should be roughly within the event's
|
|
|
|
|
timespan.
|
|
|
|
|
* streams from other cameras. Recorded views from two cameras of the same
|
|
|
|
|
event should have similar timestamps.
|
|
|
|
|
* events noted by the owner of the system, neighbors, police, etc., for the
|
|
|
|
|
purpose of determining chronology, to the extent those persons use
|
|
|
|
|
accurate clocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two segments of video recorded from the same stream of the same camera should
|
|
|
|
|
not overlap. This would make it impossible for a user interface to present a
|
|
|
|
|
simple timeline for accessing all recorded video.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Durations should be useful over short timescales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If an object's motion is recorded, distance travelled divided by the
|
|
|
|
|
duration of the frames over which this motion occurred should reflect the
|
|
|
|
|
object's average speed.
|
|
|
|
|
* Motion should appear smooth. There shouldn't be excessive frame-to-frame
|
|
|
|
|
jitter due to such factors as differences in encoding time or network
|
|
|
|
|
transmission.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This document describes an approach to achieving these goals when the
|
|
|
|
|
following statements are true:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the NVR's system clock is within a second of correct on startup. (True
|
|
|
|
|
when NTP is functioning or when the system has a real-time clock battery
|
|
|
|
|
to preserve a previous correct time.)
|
|
|
|
|
* the NVR's system time does not experience forward or backward "step"
|
|
|
|
|
corrections (as opposed to frequency correction) during operation.
|
|
|
|
|
* the NVR's system time advances at roughly the correct frequency. (NTP
|
|
|
|
|
achieves this through frequency correction when operating correctly.)
|
|
|
|
|
* the cameras' clock frequencies are off by no more than 500 parts per
|
|
|
|
|
million (roughly 43 seconds per day).
|
|
|
|
|
* the cameras are geographically close to the NVR, so in most cases network
|
|
|
|
|
transmission time is under 50 ms. (Occasional delays are to be expected,
|
|
|
|
|
however.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When one or more of those statements are false, the system should degrade
|
|
|
|
|
gracefully: preserve what properties it can, gather video anyway, and when
|
|
|
|
|
possible include sufficient metadata to assess trustworthiness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, the system should not require manual configuration of camera
|
|
|
|
|
frequency corrections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Background
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time in a distributed system is notoriously tricky. [Falsehoods programmers
|
|
|
|
|
believe about
|
|
|
|
|
time](http://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time)
|
|
|
|
|
and [More falsehoods programmers believe about time; "wisdom of the crowd"
|
|
|
|
|
edition](http://infiniteundo.com/post/25509354022/more-falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time)
|
|
|
|
|
give a taste of the problems encountered. These problems are found even in
|
|
|
|
|
datacenters with expensive, well-tested hardware and relatively reliable
|
|
|
|
|
network connections. Moonfire NVR is meant to run on an inexpensive
|
|
|
|
|
single-board computer and record video from budget, closed-source cameras,
|
|
|
|
|
so such problems are to be expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR typically has access to the following sources of time
|
|
|
|
|
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the local `CLOCK_REALTIME`. Ideally this is maintained by `ntpd`:
|
|
|
|
|
synchronized on startup, and frequency-corrected during operation. A
|
|
|
|
|
hardware real-time clock and battery keep accurate time across restarts
|
|
|
|
|
if the network is unavailable on startup. In the worst case, the system
|
|
|
|
|
has no real-time clock or no battery and a network connection is
|
|
|
|
|
unavailable. The time is far in the past on startup and is never
|
|
|
|
|
corrected or is corrected via a step while Moonfire NVR is running.
|
|
|
|
|
* the local `CLOCK_MONOTONIC`. This should be frequency-corrected by `ntpd`
|
|
|
|
|
and guaranteed to never experience "steps", though its reference point is
|
|
|
|
|
unspecified.
|
|
|
|
|
* the local `ntpd`, which can be used to determine if the system is
|
|
|
|
|
synchronized to NTP and quantify the precision of synchronization.
|
|
|
|
|
* each camera's clock. The ONVIF specification mandates cameras must
|
|
|
|
|
support synchronizing clocks via NTP, but in practice cameras appear to
|
|
|
|
|
use SNTP clients which simply step time periodically and provide no
|
|
|
|
|
interface to determine if the clock is currently synchronized. This
|
2018-03-22 01:32:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
document's author owns several cameras with clocks that run roughly 20
|
|
|
|
|
ppm fast (2 seconds per day) and are adjusted via steps.
|
2016-12-26 23:55:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
* the RTP timestamps from each of a camera's streams. As described in [RFC
|
|
|
|
|
3550 section 5.1](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3550#section-5.1), these
|
|
|
|
|
are monotonically increasing with an unspecified reference point. They
|
|
|
|
|
can't be directly compared to other cameras or other streams from the
|
|
|
|
|
same camera. Emperically, budget cameras don't appear to do any frequency
|
|
|
|
|
correction on these timestamps.
|
|
|
|
|
* in some cases, RTCP sender reports, as described in [RFC 3550 section
|
|
|
|
|
6.4](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3550#section-6.4). These correlate
|
|
|
|
|
RTP timestamps with the camera's real time clock. However, these are only
|
|
|
|
|
sent periodically, not necessarily at the beginning of the session.
|
|
|
|
|
Some cameras omit them entirely depending on firmware version, as noted
|
|
|
|
|
in [this forum post](http://www.cctvforum.com/viewtopic.php). Additionally,
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR currently uses ffmpeg's libavformat for RTSP protocol
|
|
|
|
|
handling; this library exposes these reports in a limited fashion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The camera records video frames as in the diagram below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-27 00:41:19 -05:00
|
|
|
|
![Video frame timeline](time-frames.png)
|
2016-12-26 23:55:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each frame has an associated RTP timestamp. It's unclear from skimming RFC
|
|
|
|
|
3550 exactly what time this represents, but it must be some time after the
|
|
|
|
|
last frame and before the next frame. At a typical rate of 30 frames per
|
|
|
|
|
second, this timespan is short enough that this uncertainty won't be the
|
|
|
|
|
largest source of time error in the system. We'll assume arbitrarily that the
|
|
|
|
|
timestamp refers to the start of exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RTP doesn't transmit the duration of each video frame; it must be calculated
|
|
|
|
|
from the timestamp of the following frame. This means that if a stream is
|
|
|
|
|
terminated, the final frame has unknown duration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in [schema.md](schema.md), Moonfire NVR saves RTSP video streams
|
|
|
|
|
into roughly one-minute "recordings", with a fixed rotation offset after the
|
|
|
|
|
minute in the NVR's wall time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR will use the RTP timestamps to calculate video frames' durations.
|
|
|
|
|
For the first segment of video, it will trust these completely. It will use
|
|
|
|
|
them and the NVR's wall clock time to establish the start time of the
|
|
|
|
|
recording. For following segments, it will slightly adjust durations to
|
|
|
|
|
compensate for difference between the frequencies of the camera and NVR
|
|
|
|
|
clock, trusting the latter to be accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Detailed design
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On every frame of video, Moonfire NVR will get a timestamp from
|
|
|
|
|
`CLOCK_MONOTONIC`. On the first frame, it will additionally get a timestamp
|
|
|
|
|
from `CLOCK_REALTIME` and compute the difference. It uses these to compute a
|
|
|
|
|
monotonically increasing real time of receipt for every frame, called the
|
|
|
|
|
_local frame time_. Assuming the local clock is accurate, this time is an
|
|
|
|
|
upper bound on when the frame was generated. The difference is the sum of the
|
|
|
|
|
following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* H.264 encoding
|
|
|
|
|
* buffering on the camera (particularly when starting the stream—some
|
|
|
|
|
cameras apparently send frames that were captured before the RTSP session
|
|
|
|
|
was established)
|
|
|
|
|
* network transmission time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These values may produce some jitter, so the local frame time is not directly
|
|
|
|
|
used to calculate frame durations. Instead, they are primarily taken from
|
|
|
|
|
differences in RTP timestamps from one frame to the next. During the first
|
|
|
|
|
segment of video, these RTP timestamp differences are used directly, without
|
|
|
|
|
correcting for incorrect camera frequency. At the design limit of 500 ppm
|
|
|
|
|
camera frequency error, and an upper bound of two minutes of recording for the
|
|
|
|
|
initial segment (explained below), this causes a maximum of 60 milliseconds of
|
|
|
|
|
error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The _local start time_ of a segment is calculated when ending it. It's defined
|
|
|
|
|
as the minimum for all frames of the local frame time minus the duration of
|
|
|
|
|
all previous frames. If there are many frames, this means neither initial
|
|
|
|
|
buffering nor spikes of delay in H.264 encoding or network transmission cause
|
|
|
|
|
the local start time to become inaccurate. The least delayed frame wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first segment either ends with the RTSP session (due to error/shutdown) or
|
|
|
|
|
on rotation. In the former case, there may not be many samples to use in
|
|
|
|
|
calculating the local start time; accuracy may suffer but the system degrades
|
|
|
|
|
gracefully. Rotation doesn't happen until the second time the rotation offset
|
|
|
|
|
is passed, so rotation happens after 1–2 minutes rather than 0–1 minutes to
|
|
|
|
|
maximize accuracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The _start time_ of the first segment is its local start time. The start time
|
|
|
|
|
of following segments is the end time of the previous segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The duration of following segments is adjusted to compensate for camera
|
|
|
|
|
frequency error, assuming the NVR clock's frequency is more trustworthy. This
|
|
|
|
|
is done as follows. The _local duration_ of segment _i_ is calculated as the
|
|
|
|
|
local start time of segment _i+1_ minus the local start time of segment _i_.
|
|
|
|
|
The _cumulative error_ as of segment _i_ is defined as the local duration of
|
|
|
|
|
all previous segments minus the duration of all previous segments. The
|
|
|
|
|
duration of segment _i_ should be adjusted by up to 500 ppm to eliminate
|
|
|
|
|
cumulative error. (For a one-minute segment, this is 0.3 ms, or 27 90kHz units.)
|
|
|
|
|
This correction should be spread out across the segment to minimize jitter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each segment's local start time is also stored in the database as a delta to
|
|
|
|
|
the segment's start time. These stored values aren't for normal system
|
|
|
|
|
operation but may be handy in understanding and correcting errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Caveats
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 01:32:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
### Stream mismatches
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-26 23:55:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
There's no particular reason to believe this will produce perfectly matched
|
|
|
|
|
streams between cameras or even of main and sub streams within a camera.
|
|
|
|
|
If this is insufficient, there's an alternate calculation of start time that
|
|
|
|
|
could be used in some circumstances: the _camera start time_. The first RTCP
|
|
|
|
|
sender report could be used to correlate a RTP timestamp with the camera's
|
|
|
|
|
wall clock, and thus calculate the camera's time as of the first frame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The _start time_ of the first segment could be either its local start time or
|
|
|
|
|
its camera start time, determined via the following rules:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-27 00:39:00 -05:00
|
|
|
|
1. if there is no camera start time (due to the lack of a RTCP sender
|
|
|
|
|
report), the local start time wins by default.
|
|
|
|
|
2. if the camera start time is before 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC, the local
|
|
|
|
|
start time wins.
|
|
|
|
|
3. if the local start time is before 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC, the camera
|
|
|
|
|
start time wins.
|
|
|
|
|
4. if the times differ by more than 5 seconds, the local start time wins.
|
|
|
|
|
5. otherwise, the camera start time wins.
|
2016-12-26 23:55:43 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These rules are a compromise. When a system starts up without NTP or a clock
|
|
|
|
|
battery, it typically reverts to a time in the distant past. Therefore times
|
|
|
|
|
before Moonfire NVR was written should be checked for and avoided. When both
|
|
|
|
|
systems have a believably recent timestamp, the local time is typically more
|
|
|
|
|
accurate, but the camera time allows a closer match between two streams of
|
|
|
|
|
the same camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This still doesn't completely solve the problem, and it's unclear it is even
|
|
|
|
|
better. When using camera start times, different cameras' streams may be
|
|
|
|
|
mismatched by up twice the 5-second threshold described above. This could even
|
|
|
|
|
happen for two streams within the same camera if a significant step happens
|
|
|
|
|
between their establishment. More frequent SNTP adjustments may help, so that
|
|
|
|
|
individual steps are less frequent. Or Moonfire NVR could attempt to address
|
|
|
|
|
this with more complexity: use sender reports of established RTSP sessions to
|
|
|
|
|
detect and compensate for these clock splits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's unclear if these additional mechanisms are desirable or worthwhile. The
|
|
|
|
|
simplest approach will be adopted initially and adapted as necessary.
|
2018-03-22 01:32:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Time discontinuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the local system's wall clock time jumps during a recording ([as has
|
|
|
|
|
happened](https://github.com/scottlamb/moonfire-nvr/issues/9#issuecomment-322663674)),
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR will continue to use the initial wall clock time for as long as
|
|
|
|
|
the recording lasts. This can result in some unfortunate behaviors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* a recording that lasts for months might have an incorrect time all the
|
|
|
|
|
way through because `ntpd` took a few minutes on startup.
|
|
|
|
|
* two recordings that were in fact simultaneous might be recorded with very
|
|
|
|
|
different times because a time jump happened between their starts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It might be better to use the new time (assuming that ntpd has made a
|
|
|
|
|
correction) retroactively. This is unimplemented, but the
|
|
|
|
|
`recording_integrity` database table has a `wall_time_delta_90k` field which
|
|
|
|
|
could be used for this purpose, either automatically or interactively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would also be possible to split a recording in two if a "significant" time
|
|
|
|
|
jump is noted, or to allow manually restarting a recording without restarting
|
|
|
|
|
the entire program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Leap seconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UTC time is defined as the seconds since epoch _excluding
|
|
|
|
|
leap seconds_. Thus, timestamps during the leap second are ambiguous, and
|
|
|
|
|
durations across the leap second should be adjusted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In POSIX, the system clock (as returned by `clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME,
|
|
|
|
|
...`) is defined as representing UTC. Note that some
|
|
|
|
|
systems may instead be following a [leap
|
|
|
|
|
smear](https://developers.google.com/time/smear) policy in which instead of
|
|
|
|
|
one second happening twice, the clock runs slower. For a 24-hour period, the
|
|
|
|
|
clock runs slower by a factor of 1/86,400 (an extra ~11.6 μs/s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Moonfire NVR, all wall times in the database are based on UTC as reported
|
|
|
|
|
by the system, and it's assumed that `start + duration = end`. Thus, a leap
|
|
|
|
|
second is similar to a one-second time jump (see "Time discontinuities"
|
|
|
|
|
above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here are some options for improvement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Use `clock_gettime(CLOCK_TAI, ...)` timestamps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timestamps in the TAI clock system don't skip leap seconds. There's a system
|
|
|
|
|
interface intended to provide timestamps in this clock system, and Moonfire
|
|
|
|
|
NVR could use it. Unfortunately this has several problems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `CLOCK_TAI` is only available on Linux. It'd be preferable to handle
|
|
|
|
|
timestamps in a consistent way on other platforms. (At least on macOS,
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR's current primary development platform.)
|
|
|
|
|
* `CLOCK_TAI` is wrong on startup and possibly adjusted later. The offset
|
|
|
|
|
between TAI and UTC is initially assumed to be 0. It's corrected when/if
|
|
|
|
|
a sufficiently new `ntpd` starts.
|
|
|
|
|
* We'd need a leap second table to translate this into calendar time. One
|
|
|
|
|
would have to be downloaded from the Internet periodically, and we'd need
|
|
|
|
|
to consider the case in which the available table is expired.
|
|
|
|
|
* `CLOCK_TAI` likely doesn't work properly with leap smear systems. Where
|
|
|
|
|
the leap smear prevents a time jump for `CLOCK_REALTIME`, it likely
|
|
|
|
|
introduces one for `CLOCK_TAI`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Use a leap second table when calculating differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR could retrieve UTC timestamps from the system then translate then
|
|
|
|
|
to TAI via a leap second table, either before writing them to the database or
|
|
|
|
|
whenever doing math on timestamps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with `CLOCK_TAI`, this would require downloading a leap second table from
|
|
|
|
|
the Internet periodically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This would mostly solve the problem at the cost of complexity. Timestamps
|
|
|
|
|
obtained from the system for a two-second period starting with each leap
|
|
|
|
|
second would still be ambiguous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Use smeared time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moonfire NVR could make no code changes and ask the system administrator to
|
|
|
|
|
use smeared time. This is the simplest option. On a leap smear system, there
|
|
|
|
|
are no time jumps. The ~11.6 ppm frequency error and the maximum introduced
|
|
|
|
|
absolute error of 0.5 sec can be considered acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, Moonfire NVR could assume a specific leap smear policy (such as
|
|
|
|
|
24-hour linear smear from 12:00 the day before to 12:00 the day after) and
|
|
|
|
|
attempt to correct the time into TAI with a leap second table. This behavior
|
|
|
|
|
would work well on a system with the expected configuration and produce
|
|
|
|
|
surprising results on other systems. It's unfortunate that there's no standard
|
|
|
|
|
way to determine if a system is using a leap smear and with what policy.
|