there is a possibility that slow drives can actually add latency
to the overall call, leading to a large spike in latency.
this can happen if there are other parallel listObjects()
calls to the same drive, in-turn causing each other to sort
of serialize.
this potentially improves performance and makes PutObject()
also non-blocking.
This change adds a `Secret` property to `HelpKV` to identify secrets
like passwords and auth tokens that should not be revealed by the server
in its configuration fetching APIs. Configuration reporting APIs now do
not return secrets.
Will combine or write partial data of each version found in the inspect data.
Example:
```
> xl-meta -export -combine inspect-data.1228fb52.zip
(... metadata json...)
}
Attempting to combine version "994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc".
Read shard 1 Data shards 9 Parity 4 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-01-of-13.data)
Read shard 2 Data shards 9 Parity 4 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-02-of-13.data)
Read shard 3 Data shards 9 Parity 4 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-03-of-13.data)
Read shard 4 Data shards 9 Parity 4 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-04-of-13.data)
Read shard 6 Data shards 9 Parity 4 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-06-of-13.data)
Read shard 7 Data shards 9 Parity 4 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-07-of-13.data)
Read shard 8 Data shards 8 Parity 5 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-08-of-13.data)
Read shard 9 Data shards 8 Parity 5 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-09-of-13.data)
Read shard 10 Data shards 8 Parity 5 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-10-of-13.data)
Read shard 11 Data shards 8 Parity 5 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-11-of-13.data)
Read shard 13 Data shards 8 Parity 5 (994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc/shard-13-of-13.data)
Attempting to reconstruct using parity sets:
* Setup: Data shards: 9 - Parity blocks: 6
Have 6 complete remapped data shards and 6 complete parity shards. Could NOT reconstruct: too few shards given
* Setup: Data shards: 8 - Parity blocks: 5
Have 5 complete remapped data shards and 5 complete parity shards. Could reconstruct completely
0 bytes missing. Truncating 0 from the end.
Wrote output to 994f1113-da94-4be1-8551-9dbc54b204bc.complete
```
So far only inline data, but no real reason that external data can't also be included with some handling of blocks.
Supports only unencrypted data.
For policy attach/detach API to work correctly the server should hold a
lock before reading existing policy mapping and until after writing the
updated policy mapping. This is fixed in this change.
A site replication bug, where LDAP policy attach/detach were not
correctly propagated is also fixed in this change.
Bonus: Additionally, the server responds with the actual (or net)
changes performed in the attach/detach API call. For e.g. if a user
already has policy A applied, and a call to attach policies A and B is
performed, the server will respond that B was attached successfully.
A continuation of PR #17479 for rebalance behavior must
also match the decommission behavior.
Fixes bug where rebalance would ignore rebalancing object
versions after one of the version returned "ObjectNotFound"
while decommissioning it can so happen that the non-current
versions are all expired but there is a DEL marker as the
latest version.
For such objects, we should not decommission them instead
calculate the remaining versions and if the remaining versions
is one and that version is a DEL marker consider such
an object not to be scheduled for decommissioning.
With the current asynchronous behaviour in sending notification events
to the targets, we can't provide guaranteed delivery as the systems
might go for restarts.
For such event-driven use-cases, we can provide an option to enable
synchronous events where the APIs wait until the event is successfully
sent or persisted.
This commit adds 'MINIO_API_SYNC_EVENTS' env which when set to 'on'
will enable sending/persisting events to targets synchronously.
A state is updated with a delete marker, which does not have parity or
data blocks defined, which can cause the integer divide by zero panics.
This commit fixes to avoid panics.
on "unversioned" buckets there are situations
when successive concurrent I/O can lead to
an inconsistent state() with mtime while the
etag might be the same for the object on disk.
in such a scenario it is possible for us to
allow reading of the object since etag matches
and if etag matches we are guaranteed that we
have enough copies the object will be readable
and same.
This PR allows fallback in such scenarios.
This PR also returns the replication status in
proxy calls and defers replication attempt if
HEAD on object version returned a error different
from NoSuchKey
A specific node should do the decommissioning task, however routing the
start decommissioning to that node was not working properly.
Co-authored-by: Anis Elleuch <anis@min.io>
fixes an issue under bucket replication could cause
ETags for replicated SSE-S3 single part PUT objects,
to fail as we would attempt a decryption while listing,
or stat() operation.
- lifecycle must return InvalidArgument for rule errors
- do not return `null` versionId in HTTP header
- reject mixed SSE uploads with correct error message
- getObjectTagging to be allowed for anonymous policies
- return correct errors for invalid retention period
- return sorted list of tags for an object
- putObjectTagging must return 200 OK not 204 OK
- return 409 ErrObjectLockConfigurationNotAllowed for existing buckets
Harshavardhana
Minio Trusted
Klaus Post
Anis Eleuch
Aditya Manthramurthy
Praveen raj Mani
jiuker
Poorna
mungo312
Alex
dependabot[bot]
Shubhendu
drivebyer