It is possible that GetLock() call remembers a previously
failed releaseAll() when there are networking issues, now
this state can have potential side effects.
This PR tries to avoid this side affect by making sure
to initialize NewNSLock() for each GetLock() attempts
made to avoid any prior state in the memory that can
interfere with the new lock grants.
The current usage of assuming `default` parity of `4` is not correct
for all objects stored on MinIO, objects in .minio.sys have maximum
parity, healing won't trigger on these objects due to incorrect
verification of quorum.
time.Format() is not necessary prematurely for JSON
marshalling, since JSON marshalling indeed defaults
to RFC3339Nano.
This also ensures the 'time' is remembered until its
logged and it is the same time when the 'caller'
invoked 'log' functions.
The AddUser() API endpoint was accepting a policy field.
This API is used to update a user's secret key and account
status, and allows a regular user to update their own secret key.
The policy update is also applied though does not appear to
be used by any existing client-side functionality.
This fix changes the accepted request body type and removes
the ability to apply policy changes as that is possible via the
policy set API.
NOTE: Changing passwords can be disabled as a workaround
for this issue by adding an explicit "Deny" rule to disable the API
for users.
This PR is an attempt to make this configurable
as not all situations have same level of tolerable
delta, i.e disks are replaced days apart or even
hours.
There is also a possibility that nodes have drifted
in time, when NTP is not configured on the system.
data shards were wrong due to a healing bug
reported in #13803 mainly with unaligned object
sizes.
This PR is an attempt to automatically avoid
these shards, with available information about
the `xl.meta` and actually disk mtime.
- When using MinIO's internal IDP, STS credential permissions did not check the
groups of a user.
- Also fix bug in policy checking in AccountInfo call
Also log all the missed events and logs instead of silently
swallowing the events.
Bonus: Extend the logger webhook to support mTLS
similar to audit webhook target.
- r.ulock was not locked when r.UsageCache was being modified
Bonus:
- simplify code by removing some unnecessary clone methods - we can
do this because go arrays are values (not pointers/references) that are
automatically copied on assignment.
- remove some unnecessary map allocation calls
data-structures were repeatedly initialized
this causes GC pressure, instead re-use the
collectors.
Initialize collectors in `init()`, also make
sure to honor the cache semantics for performance
requirements.
Avoid a global map and a global lock for metrics
lookup instead let them all be lock-free unless
the cache is being invalidated.
When STS credentials are created for a user, a unique (hopefully stable) parent
user value exists for the credential, which corresponds to the user for whom the
credentials are created. The access policy is mapped to this parent-user and is
persisted. This helps ensure that all STS credentials of a user have the same
policy assignment at all times.
Before this change, for an OIDC STS credential, when the policy claim changes in
the provider (when not using RoleARNs), the change would not take effect on
existing credentials, but only on new ones.
To support existing STS credentials without parent-user policy mappings, we
lookup the policy in the policy claim value. This behavior should be deprecated
when such support is no longer required, as it can still lead to stale
policy mappings.
Additionally this change also simplifies the implementation for all non-RoleARN
STS credentials. Specifically, for AssumeRole (internal IDP) STS credentials,
policies are picked up from the parent user's policies; for
AssumeRoleWithCertificate STS credentials, policies are picked up from the
parent user mapping created when the STS credential is generated.
AssumeRoleWithLDAP already picks up policies mapped to the virtual parent user.
A corner case can occur where the delete-marker was propagated
but the metadata could not be updated on the primary. Sending
a RemoveObject call with the Delete marker version would end
up permanently deleting the version on target. Instead, perform
a Stat on the delete-marker version on target and redo replication
only if the delete-marker is missing on target.
Poorna
Minio Trusted
Harshavardhana
Anis Elleuch
Classmate Zhou
Yoann Guillerme
Aditya Manthramurthy
Klaus Post
Krishnan Parthasarathi
Shireesh Anjal