The intention is to list values of sys config that can potentially
impact the performance of minio.
At present, it will return max value configured for rlimit
Signed-off-by: Shireesh Anjal <shireesh@minio.io>
Co-authored-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@minio.io>
proceed to heal the cluster when all the
drives in a set have failed, this is extremely
rare occurrence but even if it happens we allow
the cluster to be functional.
A recent regression caused new disks not being re-formatted. In the old
code, a disk needed be 'online' to be chosen to be formatted but the
disk has to be already formatted for XL storage IsOnline() function to
return true.
It is enough to check if XL storage is nil or not if we want to avoid
formatting root disks.
Co-authored-by: Anis Elleuch <anis@min.io>
markRootDisksAsDown() relies on disk info even if the
disk is unformatted. Therefore, we should always return
DiskInfo data even when DiskInfo storage API returns
errUnformattedDisk
When reading `TrafficMeter` values, there was a value receiver.
This means that receivers are copied unsafely when invoked.
Fixes race seen with `-race` build.
`mc admin heal` command will show servers/disks tolerance, for that
purpose, you need to know the number of parity disks for each storage
class.
Parity is always the same in all pools.
prefixes at top level create such as
```
~ mc mb alias/bucket/prefix
```
The prefix/ incorrect appears as prefix__XL_DIR__/
in the accountInfo output, make sure to trim '__XL_DIR__'
Objects uploaded in this format for example
```
mc cp /etc/hosts alias/bucket/foo/bar/xl.meta
mc ls -r alias/bucket/foo/bar
```
Won't list the object, handle this scenario.
Ensure that one call will succeed and others will serialize
Example failure without code in place:
```
bucket-policy-handlers_test.go:120: unexpected error: cmd.InsufficientWriteQuorum: Storage resources are insufficient for the write operation doz2wjqaovp5kvlrv11fyacowgcvoziszmkmzzz9nk9au946qwhci4zkane5-1/
bucket-policy-handlers_test.go:120: unexpected error: cmd.InsufficientWriteQuorum: Storage resources are insufficient for the write operation doz2wjqaovp5kvlrv11fyacowgcvoziszmkmzzz9nk9au946qwhci4zkane5-1/
bucket-policy-handlers_test.go:135: want 1 ok, got 0
```
We are observing heavy system loads, potentially
locking the system up for periods when concurrent
listing operations are performed.
We place a per-disk lock on walk IO operations.
This will minimize the impact of concurrent listing
operations on the entire system and de-prioritize
them compared to other operations.
Single list operations should remain largely unaffected.
Some applications albeit poorly written rather than using headObject
rely on listObjects to check for existence of object, this unusual
request always has prefix=(to actual object) and max-keys=1
handle this situation specially such that we can avoid readdir()
on the top level parent to avoid sorting and skipping, ensuring
that such type of listObjects() always behaves similar to a
headObject() call.
this addresses a regression from #12984
which only addresses flat key from single
level deep at bucket level.
added extra tests as well to cover all
these scenarios.
- deletes should always Sweep() for tiering at the
end and does not need an extra getObjectInfo() call
- puts, copy and multipart writes should conditionally
do getObjectInfo() when tiering targets are configured
- introduce 'TransitionedObject' struct for ease of usage
and understanding.
- multiple-pools optimization deletes don't need to hold
read locks verifying objects across namespace and pools.
Harshavardhana
Minio Trusted
Shireesh Anjal
Poorna Krishnamoorthy
Nitish Tiwari
Anis Elleuch
MoonJustry
Klaus Post
Krishnan Parthasarathi
johnnyaug