UpdateServiceAccount ignores updating fields when not passed from upper
layer, such as empty policy, empty account status, and empty secret key.
This PR will check for a secret key only if it is empty and add more
check on the value of the account status.
Signed-off-by: Anis Elleuch <anis@min.io>
When running MinIO server without LDAP/OpenID, we should error out when
the code tries to create a service account for a non existant regular
user.
Bonus: refactor the check code to be show all cases more clearly
Signed-off-by: Anis Elleuch <anis@min.io>
Co-authored-by: Anis Elleuch <anis@min.io>
upon errors to acquire lock context would still leak,
since the cancel would never be called. since the lock
is never acquired - proactively clear it before returning.
OpenID connect generated service accounts do not work
properly after console logout, since the parentUser state
is lost - instead use sub+iss claims for parentUser, according
to OIDC spec both the claims provide the necessary stability
across logins etc.
* lock: Always cancel the returned Get(R)Lock context
There is a leak with cancel created inside the locking mechanism. The
cancel purpose was to cancel operations such erasure get/put that are
holding non-refreshable locks.
This PR will ensure the created context.Cancel is passed to the unlock
API so it will cleanup and avoid leaks.
* locks: Avoid returning nil cancel in local lockers
Since there is no Refresh mechanism in the local locking mechanism, we
do not generate a new context or cancel. Currently, a nil cancel
function is returned but this can cause a crash. Return a dummy function
instead.
peer nodes would not update if policy is unset on
a user, until policies reload every 5minutes. Make
sure to reload the policies properly, if no policy
is found make sure to delete such users and groups
fixes#12074
Signed-off-by: Harshavardhana <harsha@minio.io>
Thanks to @Alevsk for noticing this nuanced behavior
change between releases from 03-04 to 03-20, make sure
that we handle the legacy path removal as well.
For InfoServiceAccount API, calculating the policy before showing it to
the user was not correctly done (only UX issue, not a security issue)
This commit fixes it.
policy might have an associated mapping with an expired
user key, do not return an error during DeletePolicy
for such situations - proceed normally as its an
expected situation.
service accounts were not inheriting parent policies
anymore due to refactors in the PolicyDBGet() from
the latest release, fix this behavior properly.
This PR adds deadlines per Write() calls, such
that slow drives are timed-out appropriately and
the overall responsiveness for Writes() is always
up to a predefined threshold providing applications
sustained latency even if one of the drives is slow
to respond.
A group can have multiple policies, a user subscribed to readwrite &
diagnostics can perform S3 operations & admin operations as well.
However, the current code only returns one policy for one group.
While starting up a request that needs all IAM data will start another load operation if the first on startup hasn't finished. This slows down both operations.
Block these requests until initial load has completed.
Blocking calls will be ListPolicies, ListUsers, ListServiceAccounts, ListGroups - and the calls that eventually trigger these. These will wait for the initial load to complete.
Fixes issue seen in #11305
under large deployments loading credentials might be
time consuming, while this is okay and we will not
respond quickly for `mc admin user list` like queries
but it is possible to support `mc admin user info`
just like how we handle authentication by fetching
the user directly from persistent store.
additionally support service accounts properly,
reloaded from etcd during watch() - this was missing
This PR is also half way remedy for #11305
- accountInfo API that returns information about
user, access to buckets and the size per bucket
- addUser - user is allowed to change their secretKey
- getUserInfo - returns user info if the incoming
is the same user requesting their information
Bonus fixes, remove package retry it is harder to get it
right, also manage context remove it such that we don't have
to rely on it anymore instead use a simple Jitter retry.
Allow requests to come in for users as soon as object
layer and config are initialized, this allows users
to be authenticated sooner and would succeed automatically
on servers which are yet to fully initialize.
This PR fixes a hang which occurs quite commonly at higher concurrency
by allowing following changes
- allowing lower connections in time_wait allows faster socket open's
- lower idle connection timeout to ensure that we let kernel
reclaim the time_wait connections quickly
- increase somaxconn to 4096 instead of 2048 to allow larger tcp
syn backlogs.
fixes#10413
In almost all scenarios MinIO now is
mostly ready for all sub-systems
independently, safe-mode is not useful
anymore and do not serve its original
intended purpose.
allow server to be fully functional
even with config partially configured,
this is to cater for availability of actual
I/O v/s manually fixing the server.
In k8s like environments it will never make
sense to take pod into safe-mode state,
because there is no real access to perform
any remote operation on them.
* Fix cases where minimum timeout > default timeout.
* Add defensive code for too small/negative timeouts.
* Never set timeout below the maximum value of a request.
* Protect against (unlikely) int64 wraps.
* Decrease timeout slower.
* Don't re-lock before copying.
newDynamicTimeout should be allocated once, in-case
of temporary locks in config and IAM we should
have allocated timeout once before the `for loop`
This PR doesn't fix any issue as such, but provides
enough dynamism for the timeout as per expectation.
Bonus also fix a bug where we did not purge relevant
service accounts generated by rotating credentials
appropriately, service accounts should become invalid
as soon as its corresponding parent user becomes invalid.
Since service account themselves carry parent claim always
we would never reach this problem, as the access get
rejected at IAM policy layer.
Context timeout might race on each other when timeouts are lower
i.e when two lock attempts happened very quickly on the same resource
and the servers were yet trying to establish quorum.
This situation can lead to locks held which wouldn't be unlocked
and subsequent lock attempts would fail.
This would require a complete server restart. A potential of this
issue happening is when server is booting up and we are trying
to hold a 'transaction.lock' in quick bursts of timeout.
