On occasion this test fails:
```
2022-09-12T17:22:44.6562737Z === RUN TestGetObjectWithOutdatedDisks
2022-09-12T17:22:44.6563751Z erasure-object_test.go:1214: Test 2: Expected data to have md5sum = `c946b71bb69c07daf25470742c967e7c`, found `7d16d23f07072af1a809707ba101ae07`
2
```
Theory: Both objects are written with the same timestamp due to lower timer resolution on Windows. This results in secondary resolution, which is deterministic, but random.
Solution: Instead of hacking in a wait we request the specific version we want. Should still keep the test relevant.
Bonus: Remote action dependency for vulncheck
The bottom line is delete markers are a nuisance,
most applications are not version aware and this
has simply complicated the version management.
AWS S3 gave an unnecessary complication overhead
for customers, they need to now manage these
markers by applying ILM settings and clean
them up on a regular basis.
To make matters worse all these delete markers
get replicated as well in a replicated setup,
requiring two ILM settings on each site.
This PR is an attempt to address this inferior
implementation by deviating MinIO towards an
idempotent delete marker implementation i.e
MinIO will never create any more than single
consecutive delete markers.
This significantly reduces operational overhead
by making versioning more useful for real data.
This is an S3 spec deviation for pragmatic reasons.
> Dependency Review GitHub Action in your repository to enforce dependency
> reviews on your pull requests.
> The action scans for vulnerable versions of dependencies introduced by package version
> changes in pull requests,
> and warns you about the associated security vulnerabilities.
> This gives you better visibility of what's changing in a pull request,
> and helps prevent vulnerabilities from being added to your repository.
https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/supply-chain-security/understanding-your-software-supply-chain/about-dependency-review#dependency-review-enforcement
Signed-off-by: Naveen <172697+naveensrinivasan@users.noreply.github.com>
Use losetup to create fake disks, start a MinIO cluster, umount
one disk, and fails if the mount point directory will have format.json
recreated. It should fail because the mount point directory will belong
to the root disk after unmount.
Current code incorrectly passed the
config asset object name while decommissioning,
make sure that we pass the right object name
to be hashed on the newer set of pools.
This PR fixes situations after a successful
decommission, the users and policies might go
missing due to wrong hashed set.
- When using multiple providers, claim-based providers are not allowed. All
providers must use role policies.
- Update markdown config to allow `details` HTML element
This commit replaces the KMS / KES environment
variables with `MINIO_KMS_SECRET_KEY` when testing
healing on CI.
This change is necessary since KES `0.18.0` introduced
some API breaking changes and the healing tests run
a test (`verify-3604`) that requires an older MinIO
version (e.g. `2021-11-24T23-19-33Z`) which is not
able to parse a KES error as expected.
This commit allows the KES instance at `https://play.min.io:7373`
to get updated to newer versions.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Auernhammer <hi@aead.dev>
In a multi-pool setup when disks are coming up, or in a single pool
setup let's say with 100's of erasure sets with a slow network.
It's possible when healing is attempted on `.minio.sys/config`
folder, it can lead to healing unexpectedly deleting some policy
files as dangling due to a mistake in understanding when `isObjectDangling`
is considered to be 'true'.
This issue happened in commit 30135eed86
when we assumed the validMeta with empty ErasureInfo is considered
to be fully dangling. This implementation issue gets exposed when
the server is starting up.
This is most easily seen with multiple-pool setups because of the
disconnected fashion pools that come up. The decision to purge the
object as dangling is taken incorrectly prior to the correct state
being achieved on each pool, when the corresponding drive let's say
returns 'errDiskNotFound', a 'delete' is triggered. At this point,
the 'drive' comes online because this is part of the startup sequence
as drives can come online lazily.
This kind of situation exists because we allow (totalDisks/2) number
of drives to be online when the server is being restarted.
Implementation made an incorrect assumption here leading to policies
getting deleted.
Added tests to capture the implementation requirements.
Harshavardhana
Klaus Post
Aditya Manthramurthy
Cesar Celis Hernandez
Alex
Anis Elleuch
yanggang
Minio Trusted
Andreas Auernhammer
Naveen
Sergey Zhuk
Eco