mirror of
https://github.com/juanfont/headscale.git
synced 2024-12-25 05:35:52 -05:00
Merge pull request #348 from restanrm/remove-comment
fix(machine): remove comment
This commit is contained in:
commit
a37339fa54
15
machine.go
15
machine.go
@ -167,21 +167,6 @@ func getFilteredByACLPeers(
|
|||||||
peers := make(map[uint64]Machine)
|
peers := make(map[uint64]Machine)
|
||||||
// Aclfilter peers here. We are itering through machines in all namespaces and search through the computed aclRules
|
// Aclfilter peers here. We are itering through machines in all namespaces and search through the computed aclRules
|
||||||
// for match between rule SrcIPs and DstPorts. If the rule is a match we allow the machine to be viewable.
|
// for match between rule SrcIPs and DstPorts. If the rule is a match we allow the machine to be viewable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// FIXME: On official control plane if a rule allow user A to talk to user B but NO rule allows user B to talk to
|
|
||||||
// user A. The behaviour is the following
|
|
||||||
//
|
|
||||||
// On official tailscale control plane:
|
|
||||||
// on first `tailscale status`` on node A we can see node B. The `tailscale status` command on node B doesn't show node A
|
|
||||||
// We can successfully establish a communication from A to B. When it's done, if we run the `tailscale status` command
|
|
||||||
// on node B again we can now see node A. It's not possible to establish a communication from node B to node A.
|
|
||||||
// On this implementation of the feature
|
|
||||||
// on any `tailscale status` command on node A we can see node B. The `tailscale status` command on node B DOES show A.
|
|
||||||
//
|
|
||||||
// I couldn't find a way to not clutter the output of `tailscale status` with all nodes that we could be talking to.
|
|
||||||
// In order to do this we would need to be able to identify that node A want to talk to node B but that Node B doesn't know
|
|
||||||
// how to talk to node A and then add the peering resource.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for _, peer := range machines {
|
for _, peer := range machines {
|
||||||
if peer.ID == machine.ID {
|
if peer.ID == machine.ID {
|
||||||
continue
|
continue
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user